August 25, 2004
Interview
with CNN Anchor Fredricka Whitfield FREDRICKA WHITFIELD, CNN ANCHOR: Metrosexuals among
the politicals nothing wrong with that, well how do you
define metrosexuals? Perhaps a man unafraid of nurturing
his stylishly conscious side. Well author Peter Hyman has
written a book about this gender bending phenomenal called The
Reluctant Metrosexual: Dispatches from an Almost
Hip Life . He joins us from Detroit. Well
good to see you Peter.
PETER HYMAN, AUTHOR: Hi Fredricka. How are you?
Thanks for having me.
WHITFIELD: I'm doing pretty good. First of all,
you've got to define what is the reluctant metrosexual.
HYMAN: Well, a reluctant metrosexual is someone
who fears commitment generally and fears metrosexualality
specifically. And the reason I called the book The
Reluctant Metrosexual is because the word
reluctant tested much better in national focus groups than
hypoallergenic and turgid, so we went with that.
WHITFIELD: Does this mean that metrosexual has
become a dirty word? I mean a lot of guys who are metrosexual
just don't want to admit it, because it infers something
else?
HYMAN: I think it does, I think again personally
I use the word reluctant. We thought it would help sell
books, but also I think for me, I would never really self-define
myself as a metrosexual or as a gen-x person or preppie.
I think the terms sort of has the same kind of simplistic
moniker, and I think its being used as more as a marketing
construct than anything to define a legitimate subculture.
WHITFIELD: So then your book ends up being kind
of a funny guide to being a metrosexual? Yes?
HYMAN: Somewhat, not really. It's actually -- well
the font is very funny, I want to say, that first off.
It's printed on a very funny font. I don't know how funny
the book is. But it's really less a guidebook than it is,
to some extent unfortunately, really, an examination of
my life through a collection of humorous essays.
Now whether the person going through those kind of misadventures
is a metrosexual is up for debate. I may have some tendencies
that meet that term, such as the ability to discern between,
you know, trousers that are flat front and pleated Dockers,
apparently that somehow elevates me into that stratosphere.
But the book doesn't really give guides suggestions to
people as to how you should decorate your home or what
kind of flowers to put out. There are books that do that.
WHITFIELD: So if you are a metrosexual, you probably
already know it, even though you don't want to necessarily
profess as such. You mention in your book that metrosexuals
have an affinity for expensive home furnishings, la prairie
face products, or I guess any kind of big name, expensive
designer face products, and heirloom tomatoes?
HYMAN: Well I used those sort of very specific
examples, I think, in a way. I was attempting to send up
the point that it's become kind of this -- again, a marketing
construct is that -- in my opinion. So I -- you know, again,
and I think the next line after that is something like
oddly, you know, I prefer well-made objects to those of
lesser quality.
And I think that it's sort obvious that anyone would want
nicer things, and I don't know why -- what I have issue
is why that means you're in this kind of special class
that has this, you know, somehow this new determination.
WHITFIELD: I like it that your determination in
the book, if there is a place where metrosexuals congregate,
for one it would be the Conde Nast Building in Manhattan.
HYMAN: Well yes, although, the population of straight
men in that building is very, very small, I did work there,
I worked at "Vanity Fair" for about four years,
and I think sort of in those types of industries you have
men who perhaps lean a little bit more towards having an
aesthetic sensibility that could be just gay enough.
I think that that in a way is what, if you want a definition
of metrosexual, again I'm reluctant to use the term unless
it would help my faltering career. But if you wanted a
definition it might be a straight guy whose aesthetics
are just gay enough. For better or worse, and I'm not advocating
that people do that.
WHITFIELD: And I hope you're kidding in your book
about your experience with the Brazilian wax. Please tell
me you're kidding?
HYMAN: I don't know, you know it's difficult to
say. The book is a collection of essays that are all true
with the exception of the parts that I made up entirely.
So that part, I think we'll leave it up to the readers
to determine. But you know it was an interesting experience.
WHITFIELD: So bottom line, can you be too coifed;
you know can you be to stylish to be metrosexual, to kind
of lose the luster of being a metrosexual?
HYMAN: Can one be too coifed? I think absolutely.
And I think that anyone who sort of follows these kind
of queer eye and any sort of extreme makeover type of advice
too literally again, is probably not -- they might be a
metrosexual, but they probably don't have their own unique
since ability which I think is probably more interesting
than just being someone that follows you know a Kenneth
Cole catalog to a tee and looks like it.
WHITFIELD: All right, Peter Hyman in Detroit. Thanks
so much for joining us. The book is The Reluctant
Metrosexual: Dispatches from an Almost Hip Life.
HYMAN: Thank you very much.
WHITFIELD: All right, thanks a lot. Good luck to
you and your book. < back to main press page
|